Видео

They will be talking about this guy after Donald Von Schitzenpantz gets convicted.

I love bruce. I found his programme very fair and constructive. Thank you

I watched through Emily’s channel and if it weren’t for her I don’t think I could have stomached AMBER on the stand or the way Elaine and Rottenborn behaved while questioning Johnny Depp. They came across to me as abusive and unprofessional in their treatment of JD. Also, Elaine TESTIFIED on behalf of ALH both at opening then during and in her unethical interviews and documentary appearances. It was unsettling and very annoying to see professionals behave the way BR and EB behaved as lawyers.

the clippers are the sorriest group of mondays. everyone hates mondays so that is what i call DEI folks or n words.

fennies?

this guy?

Thank you for this video and great work. Awesome!

This is an absolutely impressive and informative presentation. Thank you for sharing your knowledge and experience.

You need to pay attention the knowledge being expressed. Great stuff.

This would be better with an interviewer who didn’t speak so fast and didn’t stutter and stammer all over the place🤷🏼‍♀️. Content is very informative 👍

Lol

07:55 True. Sometimes there’s such an overwhelming amount of physical, chronological, photographic and audio evidence etc it can be tricky deciding what evidence to adduce and what to omit.

Smug

Embarrassing!

Bruce Rivers and Peter Tragos were definitely not as knowledgeable about the case as Andrea Burkhart and Nick Rekieta (who knew a considerably amount more because of That Umbrella Guy). They were engaging and able to comment on what was going on at the time, but didn't know key facts, which made a huge difference. Example: Tragos didn't know there was no pre- or post- nup when he was commenting on Heard's direct and cross, & that lack of info affected the quality of his commentary.

❤

The comments Mr Waldman Mae about the fake sexual assault and Police finding no injuries 2as the exact same thing the jury found,She was the abuser And got 2milion,Johnnyonly settled for 1 million and he won5he case

I need to see and all I this California panel. I don’t know what kind of games they are playing are who they are scapegoating for but we will not stand by while you destroy our reparations and sit quietly while being disrespected by the very people who claim they support reparations. Reparations is strictly cash payments everything in addition to cash payments is an added bonus. This panel should accept nothing less than cash payments

Thank you so much for a stellar work all of you !!!! You made me interested in your profession, and I have learnt a ton !!!!Thank goodness this trial was televized, but it is you RUclipsrs who made it understandable for us "normal" people. AND without those cameras in the courtroom, who knows what the public would agree with the correct outcome !!! I am still a bit bewildered why AH got compensated though. I thought Mr. Depps possible statement to Waldman was protected between him and his client. He did post the statement, but we have no proof Depp was the source, do we?? Can anyone explain???

1vd buisness Is Out fir one thing money that's they don't care about thus outcome is modern day slavery

I had to come back and visit because let’s get something straight as someone who works behind the scenes on multiple platforms that helped launch tons of small time streamers at the time and continue to do the same today this panel was pretty much made up of whoever they can get a hold of or whoever one of their face on screen some more. When it comes to the Johnny Depp trial, I definitely do not think of. Limor, and as this one hurts, because I really love his channel and what he does, I do not think of Bruce rivers at someone who covered the trial. Peter-the lawyer, you know (while I don’t think of him as covering much of the trial he was around, popping in and out of other streamers who were covering the Trial 24 seven and of course that his own thing usually with his dad so OK. I can understand that. and of course, yes, there is Emily baker who you do associate with the trial HOWEVER she got there with the help and so really no thanks for it through Rekieta law, Nick Rekieta And she attracted the 45+ purple hair woman to her group/channel . And I stated this way, because if you go in there as a man or your username is definitely as a man etc. you can join as long as you either don’t speak or you don’t speak out of her chats terms. Hence making the viewing experience, not so pleasurable for men anyway, and most women under the age of 50 . The one lawyer, who they would not bring in because he’s a little too “spicy” for them and probably will tell Matthew exactly where to go if he was wrong or off about something and that is Nicolas Rekieta Who had some of the best lawyers on his stream. There was one other channel that I won’t name because her channel became nothing more than the big boys club, the mean, girls, if you will, channel. The snob of Law tube, and if you are very familiar with so-called what was lawtube .

Also I think all the money they get from resources out of the continent!!!! They have the money today! This is an old video, but look at what they can just hand over to Ukraine?????

No only reparations for free labor. Lunching us in front of each other causing psychological damage. Stopping economic wealth by burning down rosewood, Tulsa and every other place we had doing good!!!! Think of the businesses we could have had from those places? We could have had airlines, big grocery, big tech, big automakers, who knows if the caveman didn’t get jealous of our ability to create our own community wealth????? ✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿🔥🔥🔥

autism has very wide spectrum. that is why it is called "Spectrum". as a father of child w specturm, I disagree with your words that home is crucial to an ASD child's comfort. My child extremely prefers outdoor activities to home. have in mind with your expert, all children with spectrum should live in the same chicken scoop. I wish you to step down your current job for spectrum children's well-being. thanks

Lawyers sit around scheming and strategizing, but at the end of the day Elon won the case simply by being genuine. He's easy to hate from a distance, but get him in a room for long enough and he'll melt any jury's hearts.

Oh, where's REKIETA? EB WAS NOBODY BEFORE HIS SHOWS. LMMFA0

omg! This is the crossover I needed, Bruce Rivers and EDB...they both curse and keep it real!! Love ❤

I was thinking that at the EXACT same time 😂 "Elaine , your mic"

Why did they keep saying "did I read that right"? Was it to have it on the record if there is an appeal? If Amber said "That's not what I said" it wouldnt have to be located and verified. I thought Camille saying "Its not whether you believe Ms Heard or Mr Depp, its whether you believe ..." and listing 18? witnesses was extremely effective. Morgan knight, Morgan Tremaine, Isaac Baruch, Travis McGivern, Malcolm Officer. Officer, Officer..and a former sheriff, Ben who worked for the Queen of England! All those witnesses, most with extra credibility Then there's Amber. Her sister, 'former best friend and her boyfriend, living free in the condo next door,

I disagree with Lamore(?)hat it was only a defamation case. Technically yes but consider one of the questions - the key question; "WAS THE STATEMENT FALSE" That made it definitely a dv and sa trial.

😂 "WHACKADOODLE SPIEGAL 🤣😂 🤪🤣

Consider this; If any jury members in the Depp/Heard case broke the rules and looked at social media; even if a few of them actively followed the case and looke at all the memes and TicTocks, and talked about it with family and friends Jury deliberation; "What about the verdict in the UK Other jurors: "Were you looking at the internet!" They would be reported. Or even less obvious where they dont realise they are saying something not in evidence. They don't want to get "busted" so they would keep it to themselves. Even if it swayed their verdict, when it was time to defend their stance, if they disagreed, it would have to be explained by putting together actual evidence available to the jury .

Such a great team of Attorneys....Wayne Dennison was such a credit too.

You were a brilliant, totally impressive team - job well done..... AND honestly there were very "entertaining" moments!

You've got to love these amazing lawyers perspective of the best Civil court case ever,❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

The toughest one is when your spouse is a lawyer.

They did a great job of explaining and providing color commentary.😊

This panel was really amazing! Love that you all got together.

Si-T??? I'm sorry does this mean you can't call the other parent? In my case it's custody contempt. And parental alienation he's already admitted too much of his actions and deposition. He's never pled the fifth. Please explain

Thank you Excellent lawyer team for Winning the case and Giving Johnny back his Life and reputation...... ❤

So can my lawyer refuse to do what the judge ordered him to and then quit saying he's avoiding a lawsuit to the judge when he asked him why he's quitting is my

The judge ordered my lawyer to give me the body cam footage of when they took my he told me he wasn't going to give me the footage because of what was on it and what I wanted to use it for even though the judge ordered him to now the new lawyer is telling me that the footage don't exist so are the police when the first lawyer told me he seen the footage and he also quit in the judge asked him why and he said it was because he was avoiding the lawsuit you guys have stolen my kids and manipulated this s*** far enough I want answers and I want the footage it shows the proof and the evidence and I have a legal right to it I'm suing. Either jack terry

❤Chelsea❤

The only type of reparations that I would support would be those that are given in the form of education/trade school! Giving money would be useless, as many of its recipients would just squander the funds.

The mothet can apply for charity care if out of state

35 000 dollar is ridiculous to put your life at risk should be a million dollars and i dont care if u think im crazy.....your literally putting your life at risk for 35..000 most people make more then that at a full time job and the payments are broken up....your taking advantage of poor desperate women because no should do this for such s loe pay out

No, I wake up every day seeking FCA and CFCA violations, they are abundant in California, limitless.

Best CLE course ever!!! Not that I can get credit, but this was most enjoyable, thank you so much!!

Clients are paying a nickel on the gross dollar to spare their kids paying a dime to avoid Probate Trust quarter litigation cost. We ‘re helping Alternative validation certification lawyers earn 2/5 fee CFO 1/5, NICER 837PC AUP 2/5, Arbiter Paralegal $1500.00, Advocate LDA $1000.0o, Five Notary Security Guardians $500.00 each $2500.00 total, Podcaster $500.00, Guest $500.00, and RUclips Viewer who finds an Interdiction Trust Administration new client $500.00 m, $1500.00 total, putting clients needs ahead of our own with defending forgery proof administrations.

Clients are reaching out to Legals to install and service their built and delivered crine free Inheritance and legacy wealth administration in April. Lawyers can double dip joining Arbiter Interdiction traditional family lawyers. Gifting generations of client pragmatics to install permission validation title ledgers to avoid crime and minimize the fighting. NICER 837PC AUP will elevate Legals skills and revenue installing validation and certification tools and services to interdict registry detected Trust forgers, Will counterfeiters and non registered power of attorney quit claim jumpers.